In medical education and clinical practice, eyeball and orbital enlargement model as an important teaching aid, its value and function can not be ignored. So, does this model really meet the requirements of clinical practice?

First, from the point of view of the fineness and fidelity of the model, it is usually able to highly restore the anatomical structure of the eye and orbit. These models show not only the various parts of the eyeball, such as the sclera, cornea, iris, ciliary body, choroid, retina, and lens and vitreous body, but also the bony structure and adjacent tissues of the orbit. This detailed anatomical display allows medical students to gain insight into the anatomy of the eyeball and orbit without touching real patients.

Secondly, it is also very close to clinical practice in function. The model can simulate the movement of the eye and the anatomical relationship of the orbit, and help medical students understand the position and morphological changes of the eye in different states.

However, despite the many advantages of eyeball and orbital enlargement models in medical education and clinical practice, we cannot ignore their limitations. After all, models are only simulations and cannot completely replace real patients. In clinical practice, doctors are dealing with real patients with individual differences, and their conditions and anatomy may vary from individual to individual. Therefore, medical students need to study and practice in combination with real clinical cases while using models for practice.

To sum up, eyeball and orbital enlargement model has important value and role in medical education and clinical practice. It can highly restore the anatomical structure of the eyeball and orbit, and provide an intuitive and realistic learning platform for medical students. At the same time, the model is functionally close to clinical practice, which provides valuable practical opportunities for medical students.